|
New York Post, May 9, 1956 The Revival of O'Neill's "Iceman"By RICHARD WATTS, JR.The Circle in
the Square put us all in its debt yesterday by opening a revival of
Eugene O’Neill’s “The Iceman Cometh,” and it is a pleasure
and an honor to see it again, particularly in so sound a production
as Jose Quintero has staged. Of
course, “The Iceman” is too long.
It is also repetitious and inclined to be elephantine in its
tread, and it is certainly not intended for casual playgoing.
But it is a work of titanic power, one of the authentic
masterpieces of the modern theater, and quite possible the finest
drama ever written by America’s most distinguished playwright. It was 10 years
ago that the Theater Guild first offered this mastodonic drama, and
while there were a lot of people who didn’t like it then, I doubt
if anyone who saw it will ever forget its tremendous impact.
O’Neill wrote it with no concern for brevity.
He piled detail upon detail and speech upon speech, and he
seemed to introduce enough characters for several plays.
There are times when even his most ardent enthusiasts were
left a little exhausted. But
the point is that he did achieve a brooding intensity of spirit that
is often not far from overwhelming. In those days,
there was a tendency to compare it to Gorky, since its people are
the doomed misfits of the earth and its setting is a saloon and
lodging house of the lower degree. Now the comparison is likely to be “Waiting for Godot,”
because it deals with lost mankind’s search for dreams and
illusions. Indeed, it
may be said the “The Iceman Cometh” shows sardonically what
happens when Godot arrives, for Hickey, the salesman whose coming is
so eagerly awaited by O’Neill’s exiles, does get there, and
brings, not happiness, but the destruction of their dreams. It was said by
those who bitterly disliked “The Iceman” that its defeatist
message was “Stay drunk and keep your illusions.”
This strikes me as a most superficial description of what the
drama has to say. It is
true that the O’Neill misfits lose what solace they find in life
when Hickey tells them they must face reality and sobers them up,
and are happy again only when they return to their alcoholic
illusions. But I think
all O’Neill is saying is that some sort of illusions are necessary
in a bleak world and that men are lost without them, whatever they
may be. This may be a
dark and terrible philosophy, since O’Neill was a man of somber
spirit and tragic sense of life, but “The Iceman” is not
basically a thesis play. What
is important is that it is the work of a superb dramatist, with deep
insight into the human heart, a vivid and compassionate
understanding of character, and rare emotional and theatrical power,
and that the play shows all of his qualities, including his brooding
poetic sense and his occasional flashes of humor, at their peak.
Just as a rueful dramatization of the joys and sorrows of the
world’s misfits, it is unforgettable. He also wrote magnificent acting roles. No one who saw the late Dudley Digges as Harry Hope, the saloon owner, in the first production will ever forget him, but Farrell Pelly plays the role admirably. Jason Robards Jr., in the difficult part of Hickey, gives a brilliant performance, far better than the original portrayal of this all-important characterization. In addition, there is especially good work by Addison Powell, William Edmonson, Richard Bowler, James Greene, Conrad Bain, Paul Andor, Peter Falk, Joe Marr and Dolly Jonah. “The Iceman Cometh” remains a monumental drama. |
© Copyright 1999-2015 eOneill.com |